Revisiting Harold Pinter’s The Caretaker: a Semiotic Study of the Dramatis Personae
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36394/jhss/16/1B/15Keywords:
Pinter, semiotics, dramatis personae, linguistic, kinesic, proxemicAbstract
The present article sought to offer a semiotic analysis of Pinter’s The Caretaker’s characters as signifiers in their own right. The article also aimed at studying the play’s dramatis personae as loci of multi-coded expressions, with a focus on the various modes of signification associated with them. Using semiotics as an analytical method, the author explored the linguistic and paralinguistic features of the characters’ discourses as signs in relation to the play’s pivotal themes, their kinesic and body expressions as indexical signs, as well as their distinctive proxemic behavior(s) onstage. Some attention was also given to the characters’ handling of stage props and the special meanings attached to them as replicators of character personality. The results of the discussion showed that using a semiotic approach to analyze The Caretaker’s characters can yield positive outcomes in terms of comprehensive analysis and interpretation of the characters as dynamic unities of interrelated sign-systems.
References
Bibliography: المراجع الأجنبية
Arden, J. (1960). The New Theatre Magazine, 1(2), 25.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Baker, W. (2008). Harold pinter. Continuum international publishing group.
Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign. (C. Levin, Trans.). St Louis: Telos Press.
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201284
Blackburn, S. (2005). The oxford dictionary of philosophy. OUP.
Carlson, M. (1989). Places of performance: The semiotics of theatre architecture. Cornell University Press.
Cave, R. A. (2001). The cambridge companion to harold pinter. Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, L. D. (1987). Speech in harold pinter’s the caretaker (Unpublished Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b3194901 - https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b3194901
Davitz, J.L. (1964). The communication of emotional meaning. U.P.
Elam, K. (1980). The semiotics of theatre and drama. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993309
Esslin, M. (1961). The theatre of the absurd. Bloomsbury.
Esslin, M. (1987). The field of drama. Methuen.
Fischer Lichte, E. (1983; 1992). The semiotics of theatre. (J. Gaines and D. L. Jones, Trans.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Gale, S. H. (1977). Butter’s going up: A critical analysis of harold pinter’s work. Durham: Duke UP.
Gautam, K. K. (1987). Pinter’s The Caretaker: A study in conversational analysis. Journal of Pragmatics. 11 (1): 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90152-4
Gibbs, P. (1960). The daily telegraph.
Grundy, Peter. (2000). Doing pragmatics. Arnold.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday.
Hall, P. (2001). Directing the plays of harold pinter. The Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter. Peter Raby (Ed.). Cambridge UP.
Innis, R. I. (1985). Semiotics: An introductory anthology Bloomington, IUP.
Key, M. R. (1975). Paralanguage and kinesics. Scarecrow.
Lambert, J. (1960). The sunday times. http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/wmss/online/modern/lambert/lamb ert.html
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Marowitz, C. (1960). The village voice.
Newton, K. M. (1986). In defence of literary interpretation: Theory and practice, Palgrave McMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18447-7
Patki, S. and Nawle, A. (2015). A study of deixis in Pinter’s The Caretaker Act I. European Academic Research, 3 (3): 3371-78.
Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers I - VIII (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. Burks, Eds.) Harvard University Press.
Pinter, H. (1991). The caretaker. Faber and Faber.
Pinter, H. (2008). The echoing silence. https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2008/dec/31/harold-pinter-early-essay- writing.
Quigley, A. E. (1975). The pinter problem. Princeton. Princeton University Press.
Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). Glasgow: Fontana and Collins.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Turner, G. (2012). The power of silence: The riches that lie within. Bloomsbury.
Vairavan, C. (2018). Mechanisms in harold pinter’s the caretaker. Asian Review of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2018.7.2.1433
Veltrusky, J. (1984). Man and object in theatre. A prague school reader: On aesthetics. Literary structure and style. George Town University Press.
Visti, Y. A. H. (2014). The incommunicability of language in harold pinter’s the caretaker. GRIN Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
