Beckett’s Power-Full Signifiers: the Semiotics of Power in Beckett’s Catastrophe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36394/jhss/15/1/15Keywords:
Beckett, drama, semiotics, power, sign(s), modalityAbstract
This article seeks to conduct a semiotic enquiry into the problematic issue of power in relation to aesthetic representation by demonstrating that Samuel Beckett’s Catastrophe is a play that deals with the complexity of [re]presenting power rather than the representation of power per se. While a full discussion of the question of power as historically represented in theatre would eventually correspond to an ample investigation whose limits are unpredictable, the focus in this discussion is placed on how dramatic signs, verbal and non-verbal, are used to present an image of power as a phenomenon whose contours can never be fully or conclusively drawn. Accordingly, the article attempts to explain how power in Beckett’s Catastrophe is shown circulating through a series of signifying practices of a stage director who seeks to impose his will and point of view in presenting the image of a catastrophe to the audience. These practices are analysed and interpreted primarily as signs pertaining to various sign-systems, including the linguistic, the kinetic and the proxemic.
References
Barker, Stephen. 1991. 'Recovering the Néant: Language and the Unconscious in Beckett' in the World of Samuel Beckett. Ed. Joseph. H. Smith, 125-156. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1981. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Trans. C. Levin. St Louis: Telos Press.
___ . 1987. Forget Foucault. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
___ . 2002. The Spirit of Terrorism and Other Essays (2002). Trans. Christopher Turner. London and New York: Verso.
Beckett, Samuel.1984. Collected Shorter Plays of Samuel Beckett. London and Boston: Faber and Faber.
Berger, Arthur Asa. 2009. What Objects Mean: an Introduction to Material Culture. The Economic History Review, 64: 705-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2010.00578_29.x
___. 2010. The Objects of affection: Semiotics and Consumer Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Carpenter, A. Charles. 2011. The Dramatic works of Samuel Beckett. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Gidal, Peter. 1986. Understanding Beckett: A Study of Monologue and Gesture in the Works of Samuel Beckett. London: Macmillan Press.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18113-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18113-1
Guest, Michael. 1995. 'Act of Creation in Beckett's Catastrophe'. Reports of the Faculty of Liberal Arts, Shizuoka University. Vol. 31.Retrieved from www.levity.com/corduroy/beckett.htm
Hall, Edward. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Hansen. Jim. 2008. 'Samuel Beckett's Catastrophe and the Theater of Pure Means'. Contemporary Literature. 49.4: 660-682.
https://doi.org/10.1353/cli.0.0036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cli.0.0036
Hodge, Robert and Gunter Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jackson, Shannon. 1992. 'Performing the Performance of Power in Beckett's Catastrophe' in Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, Vol. VI, No. 2: Spring.
Kennedy, Sean. Ed. 2010. Beckett and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knowlson, James. 2014. Damned to Fame: the Life of Samuel Beckett. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London and New York: Routledge.
Libera, Antoni. 1985. 'Beckett's Catastrophe'. Modern Drama. 28.3: 342.
https://doi.org/10.3138/md.28.3.341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/md.28.3.341
McMullan, Anna. 1993. Theatre on Trial. New York and London: Routledge.
Nixon, Mark. 2011. Samuel Beckett's German Diaries 1936-1937. Continuum International Publishing Group: London.
Riggins, Stephen Harold. Ed. 1995. The Socialness of Things: Essays on the Socio-Semiotics of Object. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882469
Sebeok, Thomas. 1994. Signs: an Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Sussman, Henry and Devenney. 2001. Christopher Engagement and Indifference: Beckett and the Political. N.Y: State University of New York Press.
Swanson, Victoria. 2011. 'Confining, Incapacitating, and Partitioning the Body: Carcerality and Surveillance in Samuel Beckett's Endgame, Happy Days, and Play' in Miranda, Vol. 4. Retrieved from http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.4000/miranda.1872
https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.1872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/miranda.1872
Weiss, Katherine. 2013. The plays of Samuel Beckett. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408189504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408189504
Wynands, Sandra. 2005. 'Visuality and Iconicity in Samuel Beckett's Catastrophe'. Religion and Literature. 37. 3: pp. 81-102.




