الهياكل النصية ومتعددة الأصوات في تغير المناخ وخطابات كوفيد-19: التحليل اللغوي الكلي والجزئي

Dahl, T., & Fløttum, K. (2019). Climate Change as a Corporate Strategy Issue. A Discourse Analysis of Three Climate Reports from the Energy Sector. Corporate Communications: An International Journal Emerald Publishing Limited, 24(3), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2018-0088

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2018-0088

Dahl, T., & Fløttum, K. (2014). A Linguistic Framework for Studying Voices and Positions in the Climate Debate. Text & Talk De Gruyter Mouton, 34(4), 401 – 420. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0009

DiFrancesco, D. A., & Young, N. (2011). Seeing Climate Change: The Visual Construction of Global Warming in Canadian National Print Media. Cultural Geographies Sage Journals, 18(4), 517-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474010382072. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474474010382072.

Ducrot, O. (2004). Argumentation Rhétorique et Argumentation Linguistique. In D. Marianne, & S. Moirand (Eds.), L’Argumentation Aujourd’hui: Positions Théoriques en Confrontation. Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. Available at: https://books.openedition.org/psn/756 (accessed 9 February 2022). https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psn.756

Fløttum, K. (2010). A Linguistic and Discursive View on Climate Change Discourse. ASP, 58, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1793

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1793

Fløttum, K., & Dahl, T. (2011). Climate Change Discourse: Scientific Claims in a Policy Setting. Fachsprache 34(3), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v33i3-4.1372

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24989/fs.v33i3-4.1372

Fløttum, K., & Dahl, T., & Kim, T. (2006). Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.148

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.148

Fløttum, K., & Gjerstad, O. (2013). Arguing for Climate Policy Through the Linguistic Construction of Narratives and Voices: The Case of the South-African Green Paper National Climate Change Response Climatic Change Springer, 118(2), 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0654-7

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0654-7

Fløttum, K., & Gjerstad, O. (2017). Narratives in Climate Change Discourse. In I. Lorenzoni (Eds.), WIREs Clim Change. Domain Editor and Mike Hulme. 8, e429. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.429

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.429

Fløttum, K., Gasper, D., & Clair, A. L. St. (2016). Synthesizing a Policy Relevant Perspective from the Three IPCC Worlds-A Comparison of Topics and Frames in the Fifth Assessment Report. Global Environmental Change, 38, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.007

Fløttum, K., & Stenvoll, D. (2009). Blair Speeches in a Polyphonic Perspective. NOTs and BUTs in Visions on Europe. Journal of Language and Politics, 8(2), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.05flo.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.8.2.05flo

Fløttum, K. (2010b). EU discourse: polyphony and unclearness. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 990-999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.014

Fløttum, K. (2014). Linguistic mediation of climate change discourse. ASP, 65, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.4182

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.4182

Fløttum, K., & Dahl, T. (2014). IPCC Communicative Practices: A Linguistic Comparison of the Summary for Policymakers 2007 and 2013. LSP Journal, 5(2), 66-83. https://rauli.cbs.dk/index.php/lspcog.

Hamburger, H. (1981). The Function of the Predicate in the Fables of Krylov. A Text-Grammatical Study. Rodopi.

Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841200

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841200

Hulme, M. (2013). Exploring Climate Change through Science and in Society. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070079

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070079

IPCC (2021): Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (Eds.)]. In Press.

Kapranov, O. (2017). Conceptual metaphors associated with climate change in corporate annual reports: two perspectives from the United States and Australia In K. Fløttum (Eds.). The Role of Language in the Climate Change Debate. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456935-6

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456935-6

Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a Model of Text Comprehension and Production. Psychological Review, 85(5). Available at (https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/teaching/1516/R216/Towards.pdf). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.85.5.363

Malcuzynski, M. P. (1984). Polyphonic Theory and Contemporary Literary Practices. Studies in 20th Century Literature, 9(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1153.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4148/2334-4415.1153

Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2009). Theory and Language of Climate Change Communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2. Available at https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wcc.2

Nølke, H. (2017). Linguistic Polyphony. The Scandinavian Approach: ScaPoLine. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004341531

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004341531

Nølke, H., Fløttum, K., & Norén C. (2004). ScaPoLine. La Théorie Scandinave de la Polyphonie Linguistique. Kimé. Available at http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:111596/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Accessed 11 February 2022).

Ryghaug, M., & Skjølsvold, T. M. (2016). Climate Change Communication in Norway. In von Storch, & Hans (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.453

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.453

Schäfer, M. S., & O'Neill, S. (2017). Frame Analysis in Climate Change Communication. In Hirley, H., Markowitz, E., O'Neill, S., Nisbet, M., Thaker, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (Eds.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.487

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.487

Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in Discourse. Oxford University Press.

Turner, J. (2005). A New Approach for Theoretically Integrating Micro and Macro Analysis. In Calhoun, C., Rojek, C., & Turner, B. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociology. 405-423. SAGE Publication Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608115.n24

Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of discourse. Longman.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academia Press.

Young, N., & Dugas, E. (2012). Comparing Climate Change Coverage in Canadian English- and French-Language Print Media: Environmental Values, Media Cultures, and the Narration of Global Warming. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 25-54. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs9733

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs9733