الصلة بين دبلوماسية العلوم والحوكمة العالمية في مواجهة المخاطر الكارثية العالمية

المؤلفون

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36394/jhss/20/4/1

الكلمات المفتاحية:

دبلوماسية العلوم، الحوكمة العالمية، المخاطر الكارثية العالمية، العلاقات الدولية، العولمة

الملخص

هذه الدراسة عبارة عن مراجعة أدبية مركَّزة بحثت في الأوراق العلمية والكتب عن الصلة بين دبلوماسية العلوم والحوكمة العالمية لمواجهة المخاطر الكارثية العالمية، وكيف انعكست هذه الصلة في تطوير المناقشة المعاصرة حول دبلوماسية العلوم. سعت الدراسة إلى المساهمة في التوصيات المتعلقة بالتصدي للتحديات العالمية. ولهذه الغاية، ركّزت الدراسة على الأبعاد الثلاثة لدبلوماسية العلوم، وطبيعة المخاطر العالمية في عالمنا المفرط بالعولمة، والفجوات في الحوكمة العالمية. تم استخلاص البيانات من مصادر موثوقة والتي سلّطت الضوء على النهج النوعي للخوض في القضية. حددت الدراسة (1) البعد التنافسي لدبلوماسية العلوم غير المستكشف إلى حد كبير، (2) بيّنت المخاطر النظامية العالمية ونقاط الضعف في هيكل النظام الدولي المعقد، (3) وصفت الحاجة الملحة لسد الفجوات في الحوكمة العالمية، و (4) استكشفت أدوار الجهات الفاعلة الحكومية وغير الحكومية في استخدام العلم في العلاقات الدولية. وبالتالي تناولت الدراسة التفاعلات بين الجهات الفاعلة في دبلوماسية العلوم والجهات الفاعلة في الحوكمة العالمية. كشفت الدراسة عن جوانب من التفاعلات والتي توضح النقاش حول دبلوماسية العلوم والحوكمة العالمية والتي تساعد في مواجهة التحديات العالمية.

السيرة الشخصية للمؤلف

الاستاذ المساعد عماد عياصره، Political Science

Emad A. Ayasreh is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Yarmouk University. His research focuses on international relations, foreign policy, science diplomacy, security and strategic studies​, energy politics, and social work. He has previously taught for the Master's Program in Management and Strategic Studies at the National Defense College. Dr. Ayasreh received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Science, Malaysia (USM). He also holds a Master's degree in Political Science from the University of Jordan and a Bachelor's degree in Political Science from Yarmouk University.​

المراجع

Abdenur, A. E., & Plataforma, C. I. P. Ó. (2020). Global governance and global catastrophic risks: Is the United Nations ready for the Anthropocene? https://globalchallenges.org/wp-content/uploads/GCF-Paper_-Global-Governance-and-the-Anthropocene.pdf

Aranda, J. (2022). Science diplomacy: Knowledge is power. In S. P. Sebastião & S. de C. Spínola (Eds.), Diplomacy, Organisations and Citizens (pp. 165–176). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81877-7_10

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81877-7_10

Barbarino, M. (2021). Past, present and future of fusion science diplomacy. Communications Physics, 4(1), 256–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00764-4

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00764-4

Berkman, P. A. (2020). Science diplomacy and its engine of informed decisionmaking: Operating through our global pandemic with humanity. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10034

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10034

Benedict, K. (2015). Global governance. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.75018-5

Bostrom, N., & Cirkovic, M. M. (Eds.). (2011). Global catastrophic risks. Oxford University Press. http://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/toc/z2008_2165.pdf

Buyuktanir Karacan, D. (2021). Science diplomacy as a foreign policy tool for Turkey and the ramifications of collaboration with the EU. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 49–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00722-z

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00722-z

Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke's approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Centeno, M. A., Nag, M., Patterson, T. S., Shaver, A., & Windawi, A. J. (2015). The emergence of global systemic risk. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112317

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112317

Collier, S. J., & Lakoff, A. (2011). Introduction: Systemic risk. Undefined. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Introduction%3A-Systemic-Risk-Collier-Lakoff/5fb75fc5a70e65be59d56c02e8a6fc601833d4b8

Cuellar-Ramirez, P. (2021). Science diplomacy for climate action and sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean: How important is the early career perspective to new governance? Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 657771. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.657771

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.657771

Dupont, C. (2020). Global governance in peril?. Global Challenges. Retrieved August 28, 2022, from https://globalchallenges.ch/issue/7/what-future-role-for-the-gs-in-the-multilateral-system/

Engström, M. (2021). Learning from success stories in addressing global catastrophic risks. (pp. 1–10). https://globalchallenges.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Learning-from-success-final.pdf

Flink, T. (2020). The sensationalist discourse of science diplomacy: A critical reflection. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10032

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10032

Galvin, C. J., Fernandez-Luque, L., & Li, Y. C. J. (2021). Accelerating the global response against the exponentially growing COVID-19 outbreak through decent data sharing. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 101(2), 115070. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204661/pdf/main.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204661/pdf/main.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115070

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115070

Galluccio, M. (2021). Science and Diplomacy: Negotiating Essential Alliances. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60414-1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60414-1

Henkin, L. (1979). How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press, 52.

Hocking, B. (1999). Patrolling the 'frontier': Globalization, localization and the 'actorness' of non‐central governments. Regional & Federal Studies, 9(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569908421069

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569908421069

Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727

Kaltofen, C., & Acuto, M. (2018). Rebalancing the encounter between science diplomacy and international relations theory. Global Policy, 9, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12620

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12620

Kontar, Y. Y., Ismail-Zadeh, A., Berkman, P. A., Duda, P. I., Gluckman, P., Kelman, I., & Murray, V. (2021). Knowledge exchange through science diplomacy to assist disaster risk reduction. Progress in Disaster Science, 11, 100188. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259006172100048X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100188

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100188

Kunkel, S. (2021). Science diplomacy in the twentieth century: Introduction. Journal of Contemporary History, 56(3), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094211006762

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220094211006762

Levy, D. L. (2021). COVID‐19 and global governance. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12654

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12654

López-Claros, A., Dahl, A. L., & Groff, M. (2020). Global governance and the emergence of global institutions for the 21st century. Cambridge University Press. http://yabaha.net/dahl/papers/2018n.pdf https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569293

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569293

Mauduit, J.-C., & Gual Soler, M. (2020). Building a science diplomacy curriculum. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00138

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00138

Melchor, L. (2020). What is a science diplomat? The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10026

Moomaw, W. R. (2018). Scientist diplomats or diplomat scientists: Who makes science diplomacy effective? Global Policy, 9, 78–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12520

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12520

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy. (2010). The Royal Society & the American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2010/4294969468.pdf

Ngoepe, C. C., Shai, K. B., Maphoto, T. E., Langa, N., Rapanyane, M. B., & Ravhutulu, K. (2019). A critical analysis of the difficulties faced by international organisations within the context of the role of the United Nations. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 7(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v7i1.263

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v7i1.263

Nugent, N. (2006). The government and politics of the European Union. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. http://archive.org/details/governmentpoliti0000nuge

Rentetzi, M. (2021). With strings attached: Gift-giving to the International Atomic Energy Agency and US foreign policy. Endeavour, 45(1-2), 100754. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160932721000090 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2021.100754

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2021.100754

Ruffini, P.-B. (2020b). Collaboration and competition: The twofold logic of science diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10028

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10028

Ruffini, P.-B. (2020a). Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: A critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 124–124. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5

Rungius, C., & Flink, T. (2020). Romancing science for global solutions: On narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 102–102. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00585-w

Selleslaghs, J. (2017). EU-Latin America science diplomacy. EL-CSID Working Paper, 8. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joren-Selleslaghs/publication/317278815_EU-Latin_America_Science_Diplomacy/links/592fe320a6fdcc89e7841519/EU-Latin-America-Science-Diplomacy.pdf

Sharma, J., Ricardo Pérez Valerino, D., Natalie Widmaier, C., Lima, R., Gupta, N., & Varshney, S. K. (2022). Science diplomacy and COVID‐19: Future perspectives for south–south cooperation. Global Policy, 1758-5899.13027. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13027

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13027

Tomalová, E., & Ullrichová, E. (2021). Water diplomacy — The new modus operandi of EU diplomacy? Innovative methods in diplomatic practice. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 16(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10079

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10079

Van Langenhove, L. (2016). Global science diplomacy as a new tool for global governance. FOCIR Pensament, 3.

Weiss, T. (2014). Global governance: A "Philadelphia moment"? One Earth Future Foundation. https://doi.org/10.18289/OEF.2013.005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18289/OEF.2013.005

Westin, U., Ingdahl, W., & Shandwick, W. Global Challenges Foundation (GCF) Annual Report: GCF & Thought Leaders Sharing What You Need to Know About Global Catastrophic Risks in 2021. https://globalchallenges.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Global-Catastrophic-Risks-2021-FINAL.pdf

منشور

2023-12-16

كيفية الاقتباس

[1]
عياصره ع. ., "الصلة بين دبلوماسية العلوم والحوكمة العالمية في مواجهة المخاطر الكارثية العالمية", HSS, م 20, عدد 4, 2023, doi: 10.36394/jhss/20/4/1.